Response 637706067

Back to Response listing

Introduction

Are you responding as an individual or on behalf of an organisation?

Please select one item
(Required)
Individual
On behalf of an organisation

Boundaries Scotland would like your permission to publish your consultation response. Please indicate your publishing preference:

Please select one item
(Required)
Publish response with name
Publish response only (without name)
Do not publish response

Can we use your email address to contact you about this review in future?

Please select one item
(Required)
Yes
No

How did you hear about our consultation?

How did you hear about this consultation?

Please select all that apply
(Required)
Word of Mouth
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Newspaper advert
Online Advert
Display Point
Other

Our Revised Proposals

Would you like to comment on a specific constituency or make a general comment?

Please select one item
(Required)
Specific constituency
General comment

General Comment on the Revised Proposals

Please give us your views on our Revised Proposals for constituency boundaries.

General Comments Box
On the Glasgow Regional boundary changes, the initial proposal to include parts of East Renfrewshire makes sense as those are contiguous and natural commuter suburbs of Glasgow. The revised proposals to remove that and instead include Erskine make no sense as it is less of a natural fit. Glasgow Regional boundaries should include areas which are relatively contiguous and whose residents are most likely to use Glasgow for work/shopping/leisure.

Would you like to draw an alternative constituency boundary to support your comment?

Please select one item
Draw alternative boundary
Complete survey